Using smart groups for computer-based security awareness training systems

ABSTRACT

This disclosure describes embodiments of an improvement to the static group solution because all the administrator needs to do is specify the criteria they care about. Unlike static groups, where the administrator needs to keep track of the status of individual users and move them between static groups as their status changes, smart groups allows for automatic identification of the relevant users at the moment that action needs to be taken. This feature automates user management for the purposes of enrollment in either phishing and training campaigns. Because the smart group membership is determined as the group is about to be used for something, the smart group membership is always accurate and never outdated. The query that determines the smart group membership gets run at the time when you are about to do a campaign or perform some other action that needs to know the membership of the smart group.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/488,474, filed Apr. 21, 2017, and titled “USING SMART GROUPS FOR SIMULATED PHISHING TRAINING AND PHISHING CAMPAIGNS,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure generally relates to systems and methods for using smart user groups, also known as dynamic groups, in computer-based security awareness training systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

As part of a computer-based security awareness training system, it can be useful to perform simulated phishing attacks on a user or a set of users. A phishing attack involves an attempt to acquire sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, credit card details, etc., often for malicious reasons, possibly by masquerading as a trustworthy entity. For example, an email may be sent to a target, the email having an attachment that performs malicious actions when executed or containing a link to a webpage that either performs malicious actions when accessed or prompts the user to execute a malicious program. Malicious actions may be malicious data collection or actions harmful to the normal functioning of a device on which the email was activated, or any other malicious actions capable of being performed by a program or a set of programs. Using simulated phishing attacks as part of a computer-based security awareness training system allow an organization to determine the level of vulnerability to phishing attacks of a user or set of users. This knowledge can be used by organizations to reduce this level of vulnerability through tools or training.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Dynamic groups are being used for purposes of reporting. For example, when an administrator searches for users that meet criteria with Boolean logic (e.g., in crystal reports with query), a report can be generated and saved. Every time the administrator runs a report, data is generated based on query.

Conceptually, similar types of dynamic groups have been used in an active directory that uses groups for distribution lists (e.g., dynamic distribution groups as used in IT environment). Dynamic group systems may be used in a manual method for security groups and in scripts that run on a regular basis for managing group membership. These types of groups have been used in things like reporting where you can create criteria of what you are going to include in a report.

In some cases, a campaign management system, for example a computer-based security awareness training system capable of running simulated attack campaigns, may only use static groups. Static groups are either manually managed or they are managed through some kind of a workflow process. For example, users that meet a criterion may be manually added into a static group and can only be taken out of the static group by a workflow process or by a manual action.

Some problems with static groups include workflow inefficiencies and workflow inaccuracies resulting from the use of static groups to form different user groups based on different criteria. For example, scenarios where company administrators try to take users out of one static group and put them into another static group resulted in many permutations of users that have been trained, have been phished, have failed a phishing test, have done remediation training, etc. Workflow driven user group membership can result in a very large number of specific logic branches that need rules to handle them. This can be especially cumbersome to an administrator that will easily lose track of these rules. It is realized that you could have an infinite number of static groups that are being driven by workflows and manual actions. If a workflow process isn't being handled accurately, users will get missed. Because static groups are driven by user workflows and an administrator, mistakes can and do happen. This results in a relatively large number of groups and administrators needing to correctly put users into the static groups at the outset.

Smart groups (which may also be referred to as dynamic groups) of the present disclosure provide a solution to these problems and limitations by accurately and automatically building a list of users that meet specified criteria at the moment that the list of users is requested or used. Smart groups are essentially query based groups.

This present solution expands on similar concepts in reporting where you can now create a group which contains users where those users meet certain criteria, and then produce a report based on the list of users. Smart groups enable similar dynamic creation of groups for purposes other than reporting, for example for training and phishing campaigns.

This solution is an improvement to the static group solution because all the administrator needs to do is specify the criteria they care about. Unlike static groups, where the administrator needs to keep track of the status of individual users and move them between static groups as their status changes, smart groups allows for automatic identification of the relevant users at the moment that an action needs to be taken. This feature automates user management for the purposes of enrollment in either phishing and training campaigns.

Because the smart group membership is determined as the group is about to be used for something, the smart group membership is always accurate and never outdated. The query that determines the smart group membership gets run at the time when you are about to do a campaign or perform some other action that needs to know the membership of the smart group. The smart group is always going to be based on whatever criteria an administrator specified when the group was created. By basing a smart group's membership on criteria and only adding users that meet the criteria at the moment when the group is used, the system ensures that group membership is accurate and up to date and that the users on which an action is performed (e.g. training campaign, simulated phishing campaign, report, etc.) are the correct users at the time the action is performed.

In an implementation, a server may establish a group based on criteria that are used to identify users, at the time when the group is going to be used. The server may receive an indication that the group membership is needed, and upon receiving the indication the server may query a population of users to determine which users meet the criteria associated with the group, and identifying those users as members of the group. In an implementation, the server establishes the criteria for the group, and in other implementations the server receives the criteria for the group. In some implementations, one or more criteria may be combined by logical operators to form a group criteria.

In an implementation, the server may receive a request to execute a simulated phishing campaign for a group, and this request is the indication to the server that the group membership is to be identified through a query using the group criteria. In other implementations, the server may receive a request for membership of the group, or a request for a report related to the group, and these requests are the indication to the server that the group membership is to be identified through a query using the group criteria.

In an implementation, the server may address to query to a database containing information about the users that is located on a different server or device or in the cloud.

In an implementation, the server may receive an additional indication to user the group and may perform a new query to a population of users to determine which users meet the criteria associated with the group, and the new population of users of the group are different from the population of users that were identified as part of the group on the previous query.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the disclosure will become more apparent and better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1A is a block diagram depicting an embodiment of a network environment comprising a client device in communication with a server device;

FIG. 1B is a block diagram depicting a cloud computing environment comprising a client device in communication with cloud service providers;

FIGS. 1C and 1D are block diagrams depicting embodiments of computing devices useful in connection with the methods and systems described herein.

FIG. 2A depicts some of the architecture of an implementation of a system configured to automatically add users to user groups responsive to a user interacting with simulated phishing emails and responsive to a user completing electronically tracked remediation training.

FIG. 2B depicts some of the architecture of an implementation of a system configured to dynamically create user groups responsive to a request and according to established criteria.

FIG. 3A depicts an implementation of a method for adding users to user groups responsive to a user interacting with simulated phishing emails and responsive to a user completing electronically tracked remediation training.

FIG. 3B depicts an embodiment of the method whereby the system tracks the number times the user of a first user group has interacted with simulated phishing emails and adds the user to a second user group responsive to this number reaching a predetermined threshold.

FIG. 3C depicts an embodiment of the method whereby the system tracks the number of courses of electronically tracked remediation training the user, who is a member of the second user group, has completed and adds the user to a predetermined user group corresponding to one or more courses of the number of courses the user has completed.

FIG. 3D depicts an embodiment of the method whereby the system adds users of a first user group to a second user group responsive to receiving an indication that a user has interacted with a simulated phishing email, and keeping the user in the second user group while adding the user back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group responsive to receiving an indication that the user completed remediation training.

FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment of the method whereby the system receives a selection of at least one criteria for which to create a smart group, establishes a group comprising the at least one criteria, receives a request to identify members of the group and identifies members of the group by performing a query of the plurality of users using the established criteria.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For purposes of reading the description of the various embodiments below, the following descriptions of the sections of the specification and their respective contents may be helpful:

Section A describes a network environment and computing environment which may be useful for practicing embodiments described herein.

Section B describes embodiments of systems and methods for adding users to user groups and systems and methods for using smart groups.

A. Computing and Network Environment

Prior to discussing specific embodiments of the present solution, it may be helpful to describe aspects of the operating environment as well as associated system components (e.g., hardware elements) in connection with the methods and systems described herein. Referring to FIG. 1A, an embodiment of a network environment is depicted. In brief overview, the network environment includes one or more clients 102 a-102 n (also generally referred to as local machine(s) 102, client(s) 102, client node(s) 102, client machine(s) 102, client computer(s) 102, client device(s) 102, endpoint(s) 102, or endpoint node(s) 102) in communication with one or more servers 106 a-106 n (also generally referred to as server(s) 106, node 106, or remote machine(s) 106) via one or more networks 104. In some embodiments, a client 102 has the capacity to function as both a client node seeking access to resources provided by a server and as a server providing access to hosted resources for other clients 102 a-102 n.

Although FIG. 1A shows a network 104 between the clients 102 and the servers 106, the clients 102 and the servers 106 may be on the same network 104. In some embodiments, there are multiple networks 104 between the clients 102 and the servers 106. In one of these embodiments, a network 104′ (not shown) may be a private network and a network 104 may be a public network. In another of these embodiments, a network 104 may be a private network and a network 104′ a public network. In still another of these embodiments, networks 104 and 104′ may both be private networks.

The network 104 may be connected via wired or wireless links. Wired links may include Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), coaxial cable lines, or optical fiber lines. The wireless links may include BLUETOOTH, Wi-Fi, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), an infrared channel or satellite band. The wireless links may also include any cellular network standards used to communicate among mobile devices, including standards that qualify as 1G, 2G, 3G, or 4G. The network standards may qualify as one or more generation of mobile telecommunication standards by fulfilling a specification or standards such as the specifications maintained by International Telecommunication Union. The 3G standards, for example, may correspond to the International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000) specification, and the 4G standards may correspond to the International Mobile Telecommunications Advanced (IMT-Advanced) specification. Examples of cellular network standards include AMPS, GSM, GPRS, UMTS, LTE, LTE Advanced, Mobile WiMAX, and WiMAX-Advanced. Cellular network standards may use various channel access methods e.g. FDMA, TDMA, CDMA, or SDMA. In some embodiments, different types of data may be transmitted via different links and standards. In other embodiments, the same types of data may be transmitted via different links and standards.

The network 104 may be any type and/or form of network. The geographical scope of the network 104 may vary widely and the network 104 can be a body area network (BAN), a personal area network (PAN), a local-area network (LAN), e.g. Intranet, a metropolitan area network (MAN), a wide area network (WAN), or the Internet. The topology of the network 104 may be of any form and may include, e.g., any of the following: point-to-point, bus, star, ring, mesh, or tree. The network 104 may be an overlay network which is virtual and sits on top of one or more layers of other networks 104′. The network 104 may be of any such network topology as known to those ordinarily skilled in the art capable of supporting the operations described herein. The network 104 may utilize different techniques and layers or stacks of protocols, including, e.g., the Ethernet protocol, the internet protocol suite (TCP/IP), the ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) technique, the SONET (Synchronous Optical Networking) protocol, or the SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) protocol. The TCP/IP internet protocol suite may include application layer, transport layer, internet layer (including, e.g., IPv6), or the link layer. The network 104 may be a type of a broadcast network, a telecommunications network, a data communication network, or a computer network.

In some embodiments, the system may include multiple, logically-grouped servers 106. In one of these embodiments, the logical group of servers may be referred to as a server farm 38 (not shown) or a machine farm 38. In another of these embodiments, the servers 106 may be geographically dispersed. In other embodiments, a machine farm 38 may be administered as a single entity. In still other embodiments, the machine farm 38 includes a plurality of machine farms 38. The servers 106 within each machine farm 38 can be heterogeneous—one or more of the servers 106 or machines 106 can operate according to one type of operating system platform (e.g., WINDOWS NT, manufactured by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.), while one or more of the other servers 106 can operate on according to another type of operating system platform (e.g., Unix, Linux, or Mac OS X).

In one embodiment, servers 106 in the machine farm 38 may be stored in high-density rack systems, along with associated storage systems, and located in an enterprise data center. In this embodiment, consolidating the servers 106 in this way may improve system manageability, data security, the physical security of the system, and system performance by locating servers 106 and high-performance storage systems on localized high-performance networks. Centralizing the servers 106 and storage systems and coupling them with advanced system management tools allows more efficient use of server resources.

The servers 106 of each machine farm 38 do not need to be physically proximate to another server 106 in the same machine farm 38. Thus, the group of servers 106 logically grouped as a machine farm 38 may be interconnected using a wide-area network (WAN) connection or a metropolitan-area network (MAN) connection. For example, a machine farm 38 may include servers 106 physically located in different continents or different regions of a continent, country, state, city, campus, or room. Data transmission speeds between servers 106 in the machine farm 38 can be increased if the servers 106 are connected using a local-area network (LAN) connection or some form of direct connection. Additionally, a heterogeneous machine farm 38 may include one or more servers 106 operating according to a type of operating system, while one or more other servers 106 execute one or more types of hypervisors rather than operating systems. In these embodiments, hypervisors may be used to emulate virtual hardware, partition physical hardware, virtualize physical hardware, and execute virtual machines that provide access to computing environments, allowing multiple operating systems to run concurrently on a host computer. Native hypervisors may run directly on the host computer. Hypervisors may include VMware ESX/ESXi, manufactured by VMWare, Inc., of Palo Alto, Calif.; the Xen hypervisor, an open source product whose development is overseen by Citrix Systems, Inc.; the HYPER-V hypervisors provided by Microsoft or others. Hosted hypervisors may run within an operating system on a second software level. Examples of hosted hypervisors may include VMware Workstation and VIRTUALBOX.

Management of the machine farm 38 may be de-centralized. For example, one or more servers 106 may comprise components, subsystems and modules to support one or more management services for the machine farm 38. In one of these embodiments, one or more servers 106 provide functionality for management of dynamic data, including techniques for handling failover, data replication, and increasing the robustness of the machine farm 38. Each server 106 may communicate with a persistent store and, in some embodiments, with a dynamic store.

Server 106 may be a file server, application server, web server, proxy server, appliance, network appliance, gateway, gateway server, virtualization server, deployment server, SSL VPN server, or firewall. In one embodiment, the server 106 may be referred to as a remote machine or a node. In another embodiment, a plurality of nodes 290 may be in the path between any two communicating servers.

Referring to FIG. 1B, a cloud computing environment is depicted. A cloud computing environment may provide client 102 with one or more resources provided by a network environment. The cloud computing environment may include one or more clients 102 a-102 n, in communication with the cloud 108 over one or more networks 104. Clients 102 may include, e.g., thick clients, thin clients, and zero clients. A thick client may provide at least some functionality even when disconnected from the cloud 108 or servers 106. A thin client or a zero client may depend on the connection to the cloud 108 or server 106 to provide functionality. A zero client may depend on the cloud 108 or other networks 104 or servers 106 to retrieve operating system data for the client device. The cloud 108 may include back end platforms, e.g., servers 106, storage, server farms or data centers.

The cloud 108 may be public, private, or hybrid. Public clouds may include public servers 106 that are maintained by third parties to the clients 102 or the owners of the clients. The servers 106 may be located off-site in remote geographical locations as disclosed above or otherwise. Public clouds may be connected to the servers 106 over a public network. Private clouds may include private servers 106 that are physically maintained by clients 102 or owners of clients. Private clouds may be connected to the servers 106 over a private network 104. Hybrid clouds 108 may include both the private and public networks 104 and servers 106.

The cloud 108 may also include a cloud-based delivery, e.g. Software as a Service (SaaS) 110, Platform as a Service (PaaS) 112, and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) 114. IaaS may refer to a user renting the use of infrastructure resources that are needed during a specified time period. IaaS providers may offer storage, networking, servers or virtualization resources from large pools, allowing the users to quickly scale up by accessing more resources as needed. Examples of IaaS include AMAZON WEB SERVICES provided by Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Wash., RACKSPACE CLOUD provided by Rackspace US, Inc., of San Antonio, Tex., Google Compute Engine provided by Google Inc. of Mountain View, Calif., or RIGHTSCALE provided by RightScale, Inc., of Santa Barbara, Calif. PaaS providers may offer functionality provided by IaaS, including, e.g., storage, networking, servers or virtualization, as well as additional resources such as, e.g., the operating system, middleware, or runtime resources. Examples of PaaS include WINDOWS AZURE provided by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., Google App Engine provided by Google Inc., and HEROKU provided by Heroku, Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. SaaS providers may offer the resources that PaaS provides, including storage, networking, servers, virtualization, operating system, middleware, or runtime resources. In some embodiments, SaaS providers may offer additional resources including, e.g., data and application resources. Examples of SaaS include GOOGLE APPS provided by Google Inc., SALESFORCE provided by Salesforce.com Inc. of San Francisco, Calif., or OFFICE 365 provided by Microsoft Corporation. Examples of SaaS may also include data storage providers, e.g. DROPBOX provided by Dropbox, Inc. of San Francisco, Calif., Microsoft SKYDRIVE provided by Microsoft Corporation, Google Drive provided by Google Inc., or Apple ICLOUD provided by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.

Clients 102 may access IaaS resources with one or more IaaS standards, including, e.g., Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Open Cloud Computing Interface (OCCI), Cloud Infrastructure Management Interface (CIMI), or OpenStack standards. Some IaaS standards may allow clients access to resources over HTTP and may use Representational State Transfer (REST) protocol or Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP). Clients 102 may access PaaS resources with different PaaS interfaces. Some PaaS interfaces use HTTP packages, standard Java APIs, JavaMail API, Java Data Objects (JDO), Java Persistence API (JPA), Python APIs, web integration APIs for different programming languages including, e.g., Rack for Ruby, WSGI for Python, or PSGI for Perl, or other APIs that may be built on REST, HTTP, XML, or other protocols. Clients 102 may access SaaS resources through the use of web-based user interfaces, provided by a web browser (e.g. GOOGLE CHROME, Microsoft INTERNET EXPLORER, or Mozilla Firefox provided by Mozilla Foundation of Mountain View, Calif.). Clients 102 may also access SaaS resources through smartphone or tablet applications, including, e.g., Salesforce Sales Cloud, or Google Drive app. Clients 102 may also access SaaS resources through the client operating system, including, e.g., Windows file system for DROPBOX.

In some embodiments, access to IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS resources may be authenticated. For example, a server or authentication server may authenticate a user via security certificates, HTTPS, or API keys. API keys may include various encryption standards such as, e.g., Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Data resources may be sent over Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Secure Sockets Layer (SSL).

The client 102 and server 106 may be deployed as and/or executed on any type and form of computing device, e.g. a computer, network device or appliance capable of communicating on any type and form of network and performing the operations described herein. FIGS. 1C and 1D depict block diagrams of a computing device 100 useful for practicing an embodiment of the client 102 or a server 106. As shown in FIGS. 1C and 1D, each computing device 100 includes a central processing unit 121, and a main memory unit 122. As shown in FIG. 1C, a computing device 100 may include a storage device 128, an installation device 116, a network interface 118, an I/O controller 123, display devices 124 a-124 n, a keyboard 126 and a pointing device 127, e.g. a mouse. The storage device 128 may include, without limitation, an operating system, software, and a software of a simulated phishing attach system 120. As shown in FIG. 1D, each computing device 100 may also include additional optional elements, e.g. a memory port 103, a bridge 170, one or more input/output devices 130 a-130 n (generally referred to using reference numeral 130), and a cache memory 140 in communication with the central processing unit 121.

The central processing unit 121 is any logic circuitry that responds to and processes instructions fetched from the main memory unit 122. In many embodiments, the central processing unit 121 is provided by a microprocessor unit, e.g.: those manufactured by Intel Corporation of Mountain View, Calif.; those manufactured by Motorola Corporation of Schaumburg, Ill.; the ARM processor and TEGRA system on a chip (SoC) manufactured by Nvidia of Santa Clara, Calif.; the POWER7 processor, those manufactured by International Business Machines of White Plains, N.Y.; or those manufactured by Advanced Micro Devices of Sunnyvale, Calif. The computing device 100 may be based on any of these processors, or any other processor capable of operating as described herein. The central processing unit 121 may utilize instruction level parallelism, thread level parallelism, different levels of cache, and multi-core processors. A multi-core processor may include two or more processing units on a single computing component. Examples of a multi-core processors include the AMD PHENOM IIX2, INTEL CORE i5 and INTEL CORE i7.

Main memory unit 122 may include one or more memory chips capable of storing data and allowing any storage location to be directly accessed by the microprocessor 121. Main memory unit 122 may be volatile and faster than storage 128 memory. Main memory units 122 may be Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) or any variants, including static random access memory (SRAM), Burst SRAM or SynchBurst SRAM (BSRAM), Fast Page Mode DRAM (FPM DRAM), Enhanced DRAM (EDRAM), Extended Data Output RAM (EDO RAM), Extended Data Output DRAM (EDO DRAM), Burst Extended Data Output DRAM (BEDO DRAM), Single Data Rate Synchronous DRAM (SDR SDRAM), Double Data Rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), Direct Rambus DRAM (DRDRAM), or Extreme Data Rate DRAM (XDR DRAM). In some embodiments, the main memory 122 or the storage 128 may be non-volatile; e.g., non-volatile read access memory (NVRAM), flash memory non-volatile static RAM (nvSRAM), Ferroelectric RAM (FeRAM), Magnetoresistive RAM (MRAM), Phase-change memory (PRAM), conductive-bridging RAM (CBRAM), Silicon-Oxide-Nitride-Oxide-Silicon (SONOS), Resistive RAM (RRAM), Racetrack, Nano-RAM (NRAM), or Millipede memory. The main memory 122 may be based on any of the above described memory chips, or any other available memory chips capable of operating as described herein. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1C, the processor 121 communicates with main memory 122 via a system bus 150 (described in more detail below). FIG. 1D depicts an embodiment of a computing device 100 in which the processor communicates directly with main memory 122 via a memory port 103. For example, in FIG. 1D the main memory 122 may be DRDRAM.

FIG. 1D depicts an embodiment in which the main processor 121 communicates directly with cache memory 140 via a secondary bus, sometimes referred to as a backside bus. In other embodiments, the main processor 121 communicates with cache memory 140 using the system bus 150. Cache memory 140 typically has a faster response time than main memory 122 and is typically provided by SRAM, BSRAM, or EDRAM. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1D, the processor 121 communicates with various I/O devices 130 via a local system bus 150. Various buses may be used to connect the central processing unit 121 to any of the I/O devices 130, including a PCI bus, a PCI-X bus, or a PCI-Express bus, or a NuBus. For embodiments in which the I/O device is a video display 124, the processor 121 may use an Advanced Graphics Port (AGP) to communicate with the display 124 or the I/O controller 123 for the display 124. FIG. 1D depicts an embodiment of a computer 100 in which the main processor 121 communicates directly with I/O device 130 b or other processors 121′ via HYPERTRANSPORT, RAPIDIO, or INFINIBAND communications technology. FIG. 1D also depicts an embodiment in which local busses and direct communication are mixed: the processor 121 communicates with I/O device 130 a using a local interconnect bus while communicating with I/O device 130 b directly.

A wide variety of I/O devices 130 a-130 n may be present in the computing device 100. Input devices may include keyboards, mice, trackpads, trackballs, touchpads, touch mice, multi-touch touchpads and touch mice, microphones, multi-array microphones, drawing tablets, cameras, single-lens reflex camera (SLR), digital SLR (DSLR), CMOS sensors, accelerometers, infrared optical sensors, pressure sensors, magnetometer sensors, angular rate sensors, depth sensors, proximity sensors, ambient light sensors, gyroscopic sensors, or other sensors. Output devices may include video displays, graphical displays, speakers, headphones, inkjet printers, laser printers, and 3D printers.

Devices 130 a-130 n may include a combination of multiple input or output devices, including, e.g., Microsoft KINECT, Nintendo Wiimote for the WII, Nintendo WII U GAMEPAD, or Apple IPHONE. Some devices 130 a-130 n allow gesture recognition inputs through combining some of the inputs and outputs. Some devices 130 a-130 n provides for facial recognition which may be utilized as an input for different purposes including authentication and other commands. Some devices 130 a-130 n provides for voice recognition and inputs, including, e.g., Microsoft KINECT, SIRI for IPHONE by Apple, Google Now or Google Voice Search.

Additional devices 130 a-130 n have both input and output capabilities, including, e.g., haptic feedback devices, touchscreen displays, or multi-touch displays. Touchscreen, multi-touch displays, touchpads, touch mice, or other touch sensing devices may use different technologies to sense touch, including, e.g., capacitive, surface capacitive, projected capacitive touch (PCT), in-cell capacitive, resistive, infrared, waveguide, dispersive signal touch (DST), in-cell optical, surface acoustic wave (SAW), bending wave touch (BWT), or force-based sensing technologies. Some multi-touch devices may allow two or more contact points with the surface, allowing advanced functionality including, e.g., pinch, spread, rotate, scroll, or other gestures. Some touchscreen devices, including, e.g., Microsoft PIXELSENSE or Multi-Touch Collaboration Wall, may have larger surfaces, such as on a table-top or on a wall, and may also interact with other electronic devices. Some I/O devices 130 a-130 n, display devices 124 a-124 n or group of devices may be augment reality devices. The I/O devices may be controlled by an I/O controller 123 as shown in FIG. 1C. The I/O controller may control one or more I/O devices, such as, e.g., a keyboard 126 and a pointing device 127, e.g., a mouse or optical pen. Furthermore, an I/O device may also provide storage and/or an installation medium 116 for the computing device 100. In still other embodiments, the computing device 100 may provide USB connections (not shown) to receive handheld USB storage devices. In further embodiments, an I/O device 130 may be a bridge between the system bus 150 and an external communication bus, e.g. a USB bus, a SCSI bus, a FireWire bus, an Ethernet bus, a Gigabit Ethernet bus, a Fibre Channel bus, or a Thunderbolt bus.

In some embodiments, display devices 124 a-124 n may be connected to I/O controller 123. Display devices may include, e.g., liquid crystal displays (LCD), thin film transistor LCD (TFT-LCD), blue phase LCD, electronic papers (e-ink) displays, flexile displays, light emitting diode displays (LED), digital light processing (DLP) displays, liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) displays, organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays, active-matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED) displays, liquid crystal laser displays, time-multiplexed optical shutter (TMOS) displays, or 3D displays. Examples of 3D displays may use, e.g. stereoscopy, polarization filters, active shutters, or autostereoscopic. Display devices 124 a-124 n may also be a head-mounted display (HMD). In some embodiments, display devices 124 a-124 n or the corresponding I/O controllers 123 may be controlled through or have hardware support for OPENGL or DIRECTX API or other graphics libraries.

In some embodiments, the computing device 100 may include or connect to multiple display devices 124 a-124 n, which each may be of the same or different type and/or form. As such, any of the I/O devices 130 a-130 n and/or the I/O controller 123 may include any type and/or form of suitable hardware, software, or combination of hardware and software to support, enable or provide for the connection and use of multiple display devices 124 a-124 n by the computing device 100. For example, the computing device 100 may include any type and/or form of video adapter, video card, driver, and/or library to interface, communicate, connect or otherwise use the display devices 124 a-124 n. In one embodiment, a video adapter may include multiple connectors to interface to multiple display devices 124 a-124 n. In other embodiments, the computing device 100 may include multiple video adapters, with each video adapter connected to one or more of the display devices 124 a-124 n. In some embodiments, any portion of the operating system of the computing device 100 may be configured for using multiple displays 124 a-124 n. In other embodiments, one or more of the display devices 124 a-124 n may be provided by one or more other computing devices 100 a or 100 b connected to the computing device 100, via the network 104. In some embodiments software may be designed and constructed to use another computer's display device as a second display device 124 a for the computing device 100. For example, in one embodiment, an Apple iPad may connect to a computing device 100 and use the display of the device 100 as an additional display screen that may be used as an extended desktop. One ordinarily skilled in the art will recognize and appreciate the various ways and embodiments that a computing device 100 may be configured to have multiple display devices 124 a-124 n.

Referring again to FIG. 1C, the computing device 100 may comprise a storage device 128 (e.g. one or more hard disk drives or redundant arrays of independent disks) for storing an operating system or other related software, and for storing application software programs such as any program related to the simulated phishing attack system software 120. Examples of storage device 128 include, e.g., hard disk drive (HDD); optical drive including CD drive, DVD drive, or BLU-RAY drive; solid-state drive (SSD); USB flash drive; or any other device suitable for storing data. Some storage devices may include multiple volatile and non-volatile memories, including, e.g., solid state hybrid drives that combine hard disks with solid state cache. Some storage device 128 may be non-volatile, mutable, or read-only. Some storage device 128 may be internal and connect to the computing device 100 via a bus 150. Some storage device 128 may be external and connect to the computing device 100 via a I/O device 130 that provides an external bus. Some storage device 128 may connect to the computing device 100 via the network interface 118 over a network 104, including, e.g., the Remote Disk for MACBOOK AIR by Apple. Some client devices 100 may not require a non-volatile storage device 128 and may be thin clients or zero clients 102. Some storage device 128 may also be used as an installation device 116 and may be suitable for installing software and programs. Additionally, the operating system and the software can be run from a bootable medium, for example, a bootable CD, e.g. KNOPPIX, a bootable CD for GNU/Linux that is available as a GNU/Linux distribution from knoppix.net.

Client device 100 may also install software or application from an application distribution platform. Examples of application distribution platforms include the App Store for iOS provided by Apple, Inc., the Mac App Store provided by Apple, Inc., GOOGLE PLAY for Android OS provided by Google Inc., Chrome Webstore for CHROME OS provided by Google Inc., and Amazon Appstore for Android OS and KINDLE FIRE provided by Amazon.com, Inc. An application distribution platform may facilitate installation of software on a client device 102. An application distribution platform may include a repository of applications on a server 106 or a cloud 108, which the clients 102 a-102 n may access over a network 104. An application distribution platform may include application developed and provided by various developers. A user of a client device 102 may select, purchase and/or download an application via the application distribution platform.

Furthermore, the computing device 100 may include a network interface 118 to interface to the network 104 through a variety of connections including, but not limited to, standard telephone lines LAN or WAN links (e.g., 802.11, T1, T3, Gigabit Ethernet, Infiniband), broadband connections (e.g., ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM, Gigabit Ethernet, Ethernet-over-SONET, ADSL, VDSL, BPON, GPON, fiber optical including FiOS), wireless connections, or some combination of any or all of the above. Connections can be established using a variety of communication protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, Ethernet, ARCNET, SONET, SDH, Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac CDMA, GSM, WiMax and direct asynchronous connections). In one embodiment, the computing device 100 communicates with other computing devices 100′ via any type and/or form of gateway or tunneling protocol e.g. Secure Socket Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS), or the Citrix Gateway Protocol manufactured by Citrix Systems, Inc. of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. The network interface 118 may comprise a built-in network adapter, network interface card, PCMCIA network card, EXPRESSCARD network card, card bus network adapter, wireless network adapter, USB network adapter, modem or any other device suitable for interfacing the computing device 100 to any type of network capable of communication and performing the operations described herein.

A computing device 100 of the sort depicted in FIGS. 1B and 1C may operate under the control of an operating system, which controls scheduling of tasks and access to system resources. The computing device 100 can be running any operating system such as any of the versions of the MICROSOFT WINDOWS operating systems, the different releases of the Unix and Linux operating systems, any version of the MAC OS for Macintosh computers, any embedded operating system, any real-time operating system, any open source operating system, any proprietary operating system, any operating systems for mobile computing devices, or any other operating system capable of running on the computing device and performing the operations described herein. Typical operating systems include, but are not limited to: WINDOWS 2000, WINDOWS Server 2012, WINDOWS CE, WINDOWS Phone, WINDOWS XP, WINDOWS VISTA, and WINDOWS 7, WINDOWS RT, and WINDOWS 8 all of which are manufactured by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; MAC OS and iOS, manufactured by Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; and Linux, a freely-available operating system, e.g. Linux Mint distribution (“distro”) or Ubuntu, distributed by Canonical Ltd. of London, United Kingdom; or Unix or other Unix-like derivative operating systems; and Android, designed by Google, of Mountain View, Calif., among others. Some operating systems, including, e.g., the CHROME OS by Google, may be used on zero clients or thin clients, including, e.g., CHROMEBOOKS.

The computer system 100 can be any workstation, telephone, desktop computer, laptop or notebook computer, netbook, ULTRABOOK, tablet, server, handheld computer, mobile telephone, smartphone or other portable telecommunications device, media playing device, a gaming system, mobile computing device, or any other type and/or form of computing, telecommunications or media device that is capable of communication. The computer system 100 has sufficient processor power and memory capacity to perform the operations described herein. In some embodiments, the computing device 100 may have different processors, operating systems, and input devices consistent with the device. The Samsung GALAXY smartphones, e.g., operate under the control of Android operating system developed by Google, Inc. GALAXY smartphones receive input via a touch interface.

In some embodiments, the computing device 100 is a gaming system. For example, the computer system 100 may comprise a PLAYSTATION 3, or PERSONAL PLAYSTATION PORTABLE (PSP), or a PLAYSTATION VITA device manufactured by the Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan, a NINTENDO DS, NINTENDO 3DS, NINTENDO WII, or a NINTENDO WII U device manufactured by Nintendo Co., Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan, an XBOX 360 device manufactured by the Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.

In some embodiments, the computing device 100 is a digital audio player such as the Apple IPOD, IPOD Touch, and IPOD NANO lines of devices, manufactured by Apple Computer of Cupertino, Calif. Some digital audio players may have other functionality, including, e.g., a gaming system or any functionality made available by an application from a digital application distribution platform. For example, the IPOD Touch may access the Apple App Store. In some embodiments, the computing device 100 is a portable media player or digital audio player supporting file formats including, but not limited to, MP3, WAV, M4A/AAC, WMA Protected AAC, AIFF, Audible audiobook, Apple Lossless audio file formats and .mov, .m4v, and .mp4 MPEG-4 (H.264/MPEG-4 AVC) video file formats.

In some embodiments, the computing device 100 is a tablet e.g. the IPAD line of devices by Apple; GALAXY TAB family of devices by Samsung; or KINDLE FIRE, by Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Wash. In other embodiments, the computing device 100 is an eBook reader, e.g. the KINDLE family of devices by Amazon.com, or NOOK family of devices by Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York City, N.Y.

In some embodiments, the communications device 102 includes a combination of devices, e.g. a smartphone combined with a digital audio player or portable media player. For example, one of these embodiments is a smartphone, e.g. the IPHONE family of smartphones manufactured by Apple, Inc.; a Samsung GALAXY family of smartphones manufactured by Samsung, Inc; or a Motorola DROID family of smartphones. In yet another embodiment, the communications device 102 is a laptop or desktop computer equipped with a web browser and a microphone and speaker system, e.g. a telephony headset. In these embodiments, the communications devices 102 are web-enabled and can receive and initiate phone calls. In some embodiments, a laptop or desktop computer is also equipped with a webcam or other video capture device that enables video chat and video call.

In some embodiments, the status of one or more machines 102, 106 in the network 104 is monitored, generally as part of network management. In one of these embodiments, the status of a machine may include an identification of load information (e.g., the number of processes on the machine, CPU and memory utilization), of port information (e.g., the number of available communication ports and the port addresses), or of session status (e.g., the duration and type of processes, and whether a process is active or idle). In another of these embodiments, this information may be identified by a plurality of metrics, and the plurality of metrics can be applied at least in part towards decisions in load distribution, network traffic management, and network failure recovery as well as any aspects of operations of the present solution described herein. Aspects of the operating environments and components described above will become apparent in the context of the systems and methods disclosed herein.

B. Systems and Methods of Adding Users to User Groups Based on Interactions with Simulated Phishing Attacks and Remediation Training

This disclosure generally relates to systems and methods for using smart user groups, also known as dynamic groups, in computer-based security awareness training systems. Other systems and methods of adding user to user groups may be based on interactions with simulated phishing attacks and remediation training, as are described in this Section B. The systems and methods allow a server to automatically add a user of a first user group to a second user group responsive to that user interacting with a simulated phishing email that was sent as part of a simulated phishing campaign. In some embodiments, users in a user group are removed when the users are added to another user group. For example, the user added to the second user group is removed from the first user group. The systems and methods further allow the server to electronically track the remediation training completed by that user, and responsive to the completion of remediation training, the server may automatically add the user, who is a member of the second user group, back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group. The systems and methods further allow the server to automatically add the user to one or more user groups upon detecting an event in connection with the user.

In some embodiments, users remain members of a user group when the users are added to another user group. For example, the user remains a member of the first user group when the user is added to the second user group. In another example, the user remains a member of the second user group when the user is added back to the first user group or to the third user group.

A simulated phishing attack may test the readiness of a security system or users of a system to handle phishing attacks such that malicious actions are prevented. A simulated phishing attack may, for example, target a large number of users, such as employees of an organization. Such an attack may be performed by a party friendly or neutral to the targets of the simulated attack. In one type of simulated phishing attack, an attempt is made to extract sensitive information using phishing methods, and any extracted information is used not for malicious purposes, but as part of a process of detecting weaknesses in security. Performing a simulated phishing attack can help expose a lack of vigilance and/or know-how in a user or set of users of a device in minimizing risk associated with such attacks. User know-how can be improved by providing targeted, real-time training to the user at the time of failing a test provided by a simulated phishing attack.

A method of adding users to user groups is as follows. A system administrator, who could be a security manager or a third party on behalf of a security manager, configures a phishing email template which is used to generate simulated phishing emails that can masquerade as an email from a party known to the user, such as an executive of the company that employs the user. The email may be designed to appear interesting to the user, and may offer or promise, for example, access to an interesting tidbit of news, access to useful computer software, access to knowledge of how to perform a money-making scheme, or any other thing that may be of interest. In some embodiments, the email may request that the user perform a certain action, such as providing sensitive information by replying to the email or transferring money to an account owned by the attacker and then sending a reply email to confirm that the money has been transferred. A simulated phishing campaign is created by a simulated phishing campaign manager in accordance with selections made by the system administrator or another individual. A system administrator selects a first user group which contains the users that will be a part of the simulated phishing campaign. The system administrator selects a second user group for which to add those users that interact with a simulated phishing email that is configured to be part of the simulated phishing campaign, wherein the second user group is selected to receive electronically tracked remediation training. The system receives the selection of the first and second user groups.

The system transmits one or more simulated phishing emails, according to the created simulated phishing campaign, to the users in the first user group. The server receives a first indication if a user of the first user group interacts with a simulated phishing email of the simulated phishing campaign. Responsive to receiving the first indication, the server automatically adds the user, who is a member of the first user group, to the second user group. One example of a user interaction with a simulated phishing email is the user sending a reply to or forwarding the received email. Another example of a user interaction with a simulated phishing email is the user clicking on a link in the received email. In some embodiments, the server tracks the number of times the user interacts with simulated phishing emails and adds the user responsive to the number of times reaching a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the server receives an indication of a detection of an event in connection with a user, who is a member of the first user group, and responsive to receiving the indication, adds the user to a second user group.

Once a user of a first user group is automatically added to the second user group, responsive to interacting with a simulated phishing email from the simulated phishing campaign, the user will begin to receive electronically tracked remediation training. When the user completes the remediation training, the server receives a second indication. In response to the second indication, the server automatically adds the user back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group. In some embodiments, the server tracks the number of courses of the electronically tracked remediation training the user has completed. In some embodiments, the server automatically adds the user, who is a member of the second user group, to a predetermined user group corresponding to one or more courses of the number of courses the user has completed. In some embodiments, the server automatically adds the user, who is a member of the second user group, back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group responsive to the number of courses of electronically tracked remediation training reaching a given threshold. In further embodiments, the user may be removed from the second user group when the user is added the predetermined user group or when the user is added back to the first user group or to the third user group.

Referring to FIG. 2A in a general overview, FIG. 2A depicts some of the architecture of an implementation of a system 200 capable of adding users to user groups in response to events. The system 200 is also capable of removing users from user groups in response to events.

Referring to FIG. 2A in more detail system 200 includes a server 106. The server 106 includes a user group management function 212 which interacts with a simulated phishing campaign manager 250, which is responsible for executing the simulated phishing campaign. The server 106 further includes an event tracker 234, a phishing email interaction tracker 235, a remediation training tracker 236, and a user group selector 238. The user group management function 212 includes a user group management application 214, a phishing email user interaction counter 216, and a user remediation training completion counter 218. The server 106 includes several storage modules. Remediation training is stored in storage 240. Users are stored in storage 241. User groups are stored in storage 242, and simulated phishing emails are stored in storage 244.

Each of the server 106, user group management function 212, user group management application 214, phishing email user interaction counter 216, user remediation training completion counter 218, event tracker 234, phishing email interaction tracker 235, remediation training tracker 236, user group selector 238, simulated phishing campaign manager 250, user interface manager 252, and simulated phishing email generator 254 may comprise a program, service, task, script, library, application or any type and form of executable instructions or code executable on one or more processors. Any of the server 106, user group management function 212, user group management application 214, phishing email user interaction counter 216, user remediation training completion counter 218, event tracker 234, phishing email interaction tracker 235, remediation training tracker 236, user group selector 238, simulated phishing campaign manager 250, user interface manager 252, simulated phishing email generator 254, messaging application 270 and/or communications module 264 may be combined into one or more modules, applications, programs, services, tasks, scripts, libraries, applications, or executable code.

The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 includes a simulated phishing email generator 254, which may be implemented as or contain a virtual machine 256. Responsive to a user input, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 generates a campaign for a simulated phishing attack, including one or more selected phishing email templates, one or more selected landing page templates, and one or more selected targeted user groups, in addition to other user input.

In an implementation, system 200 includes a server 106. The server 106 may be a part of a cluster of servers. In some embodiments, tasks performed by the server 106 may be performed by a plurality of servers. These tasks may be allocated among the cluster of servers by an application, service, daemon, routine, or other executable logic for task allocation. The server 106 may include a processor and memory.

In an implementation, system 200 includes a client 102. In some embodiments, the client may include a communications module 264, a user interface 266, a display 268, and a messaging application 270. The client 102 may interact with the server 106 over a network, 104.

In some embodiments, the server 106 includes a simulated phishing campaign manager 250 which may manage various aspects of a simulated phishing attack campaign. For example, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may process input from the server 106 and/or may provide access as needed to various applications, modules, and other software components of the server 106 to other various applications, modules, and other software components of the server 106. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may monitor and control timing of various aspects of a simulated attack campaign, may process requests for access to simulated attack campaign results, and/or may perform other tasks related to the management of a simulated attack campaign.

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign module 250 may be integrated with or coupled to memory 122. In some embodiments, the memory may include any type and form of storage, such as a database or file system. The memory 122 may store data such as parameters and scripts associated with a particular simulated phishing campaign. In an example, the memory 122 may store a set of parameters and scripts corresponding to the choices made by a server 106 through a simulated phishing campaign manager 250, e.g. as described above for a particular simulated phishing attack.

In an implementation, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 includes a simulated phishing email generator 254. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be integrated with or coupled to the memory 122 so as to provide the simulated phishing email generator 254 accesses to parameters associated with messaging choices made for a particular simulated campaign by e.g. the server 106. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, containing failure remediation training 240. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, containing users 241. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, containing user groups 242. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, containing simulated phishing emails 244. The simulated phishing email generator 254 may be an application, service, daemon, routine, or other executable logic for generating messages. The messages generated by the simulated phishing email generator 254 may be of any appropriate format. For example, they may be email messages, text messages, messages used by particular messaging applications such as, e.g., WhatsApp™, or any other type of message. Message type to be used in a particular attack may be selected by e.g. a server 106 using a simulated phishing campaign manager 250. The messages may be generated in any appropriate manner, e.g. by running an instance of an application that generates the desired message type, such as running e.g. a Gmail™ application, Microsoft Outlook™, WhatsApp™, a text messaging application, or any other appropriate application. The messages may be generated by running a messaging application on e.g. a virtual machine 256 or may simply be run on an operating system of the server 206, or may be run in any other appropriate environment. The messages may be generated to be formatted consistent with specific messaging platforms, for example Outlook 365, Outlook Web Access (OWA), Webmail, iOS, Gmail client, and so on.

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can be configured to generate messages having the ability to traverse users who interact with the messages to a specific landing page.

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can be configured to generate a simulated phishing email. The email can appear to be delivered from a trusted email address, such as the email address of an executive of the company at which the target is employed. In addition, the email can have a “Subject:” field that is intended to cause the user to take an action, such as initiating a wire transfer. In some embodiments, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can generate one or more simulated phishing emails which are stored in the simulated phishing emails storage 244. In some embodiments, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can generate multiple instances of the email which may be delivered to multiple users selected from the users storage 241, such as a subset of all of the employees of the company. In some embodiments, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can generate multiple instances of the email which may be delivered to a user group which is stored in the user groups storage 242. For example, the server 106 can select any number of employees who should be targeted by a simulated attack, can create a user group and store this user group in the user groups storage 242. The simulated phishing email generator 254 can retrieve this information from the user groups storage 242 and can generate a set of emails similar to the email, each addressed to a respective target identified in the information stored in the memory 122. That is, the simulated phishing email generator 254 can generate the emails such that the “From:” and “Subject:” fields of each email are identical, while the “To:” field is adjusted according to the desired targets.

The event tracker 234 detects and keeps track of events in connection with users associated with simulated phishing campaigns. An event may be any type of activity, interaction, behavior, notification, alert or communication that may occur by or in association with a user and/or a simulated phishing campaign. In one embodiment, an event comprises a number of times a user interacts with a simulated phishing email. In another embodiment, an event comprises a number of courses of the electronically tracked remediation training the user has completed since a last time the user interacted with a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, an event comprises a number of simulated phishing campaigns run since a last time the user interacted with a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, an event comprises the amount of time since the last time the user interacted with a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, an event comprises the amount of time since the last time the user completed a course of the electronically tracked remediation training.

The user group management function 212 comprises a user group management application 214 that generally manages the adding of a user to a user group. For some embodiments, the user group management application 214 also manages the removal of a user from a user group. In one embodiment, the user group management application 214 manages the adding of a user of one user group to another user group responsive to a user interacting with a simulated phishing email. In a further embodiment, the user group management application 214 also manages the removing of the user from the one user group when the user is added to the other user group responsive to the user interacting with the simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the user group management application 214 manages the adding of a user of one user group to another user group responsive to a user completing electronically tracked remediation training. In a further embodiment, the user group management application 214 also manages the removing of the same user from the one user group when the user is added to another user group responsive to the user completing electronically tracked remediation training. In one embodiment, the user group management application 214 manages the adding of a user of one user group to another user group responsive to an event related to the simulated phishing campaign. In a further embodiment, the user group management application 214 also manages the removing of the same user from the one user group when the user is added to another user group responsive to the event related to the simulated phishing campaign.

The user group management function 212 also comprises a phishing email user interaction counter 216 that counts, tracks, and/or manages a number of interactions of users with simulated phishing emails. In one embodiment, the phishing email user interaction counter 216 keeps track of how many times a given user interacts with a given simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email user interaction counter 216 keeps track of how many times a given user interacts with any simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email user interaction counter 216 keeps track of the amount of time between instances when a given user interacts with a specific simulated phishing email, or with any simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email user interaction counter 216 keeps track of how many times users in a given user group interact with a specific simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email user interaction counter 216 keeps track of the way and the number of times in which a given user interacts with a simulated phishing email, for example, the number of times that a given user clicks on a link in a simulated phishing email, or the number of times that a given user replies or forwards a simulated phishing email.

The phishing email interaction tracker 235 detects and keeps track of user interactions with simulated phishing emails by using the phishing email user interaction counter 216. In some embodiments, the phishing email interaction tracker 235 receives indications from the phishing email user interaction counter 216 any time a user interacts with a simulated phishing email. For example, the phishing email interaction tracker 235 uses the phishing email user interaction counter 216 to keep track of the user interactions which may be counted and stored in a database. In one embodiment, the phishing email interaction tracker 235 detects and keeps track of when the user clicks a link in a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email interaction tracker 235 detects and keeps track of when the user replies to a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the phishing email interaction tracker 235 detects and keeps track of when the user forwards a simulated phishing email.

The user group management function 212 also comprises a user remediation training completion counter 218 that counts, tracks, and/or manages the taking and completion of remediation training and courses. In one embodiment, the user remediation training completion counter 218 keeps track of the number of courses of electronically tracked user remediation training a user has completed. In one embodiment, the user remediation training completion counter 218 keeps track of whether a user has completed specific user remediation training. In one embodiment, the user remediation training completion counter 218 keeps track of whether the user has completed a minimum or specific subset of the electronically tracked remediation training. In one embodiment, the user remediation training completion counter 218 keeps track of the duration of time that the user spends on electronically tracked remediation training. In one embodiment, the user remediation training completion counter 218 keeps track of the total amount of time elapsed until the user has completed the electronically tracked remediation training.

The remediation training tracker 236 detects and keeps track of any electronically tracked remediation training that is assigned to a user by using the user remediation training completion counter 218. In some embodiments, the remediation training tracker 236 receives indications from the user remediation training completion counter 218 when a user has completed remediation training. For example, the remediation training tracker 236 uses the user remediation training completion counter 218 to keep track of any electronically tracked remediation training that is assigned to the user which may be counted and stored in a database. In one embodiment, the remediation training tracker 236 keeps track of one or more courses that comprise the electronically tracked remediation training. In one embodiment, the remediation training tracker 236 keeps track of one or more live, or in person, training that is assigned to a user. In one embodiment, the remediation training tracker 236 keeps track of mandatory training and non-mandatory training. In one embodiment, the remediation training tracker 236 keeps track of the amount of time that the user spends completing remediation training. In one embodiment, the remediation training tracker 236 keeps track of how many courses of the electronically tracked remediation training the user completes in a given time period.

The user group selector 238 selects a user group for a simulated phishing campaign. Each user group may include a list or collection of one or more users identified by a user name or user identifier. The user group select may select a user group to which to add a user and for some embodiments, delete or remove a user based on the user's interactions with a simulated phishing campaign, training, events., etc. For example, the user group selector 238 can use a processor to select a group in one or more storage modules (e.g., users storage 241 and user groups storage 242) in which to add and for some embodiments, delete or remove the user within the one more storage modules. In one embodiment, the user group selector 238 selects a user group to add users to if they interact with a simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, the user group selector 238 selects a user group to add users to if they interacted with a simulated phishing email and then subsequently completed the electronically tracked remediation training. In one embodiment, the simulated phishing campaign manager utilizes the user group selector 238 to select predetermined groups to add users to in response to specific events.

In an implementation, a simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may be e.g., another name for a system administrator, such as a security manager, a third-party security consultant, a risk assessor, or any other party that uses the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 installed on a server. The server 106 may wish to direct a simulated phishing attack by interacting with the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 installed on the server. The simulated phishing campaign manager 212 may be, for example, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a mobile device, or any other suitable computing device. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may be e.g., an application on a device that allows for a user of the device to interact with the server 106 for e.g. purposes of creating, configuring, tailoring and/or executing a simulated phishing attack and/or viewing and/or processing and/or analyzing the results of a phishing attack.

In an implementation, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250, when executed, causes a graphical user interface to be displayed to the server 106. In other embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 allows for user input through a non-graphical user interface, such as a user interface that accepts text or vocal input without displaying an interactive image. A graphical user interface may be displayed on a screen of a mobile phone, or a monitor connected to a desktop or laptop computer or may be displayed on any other display. The user may interact with e.g. the graphical user interface on the device by typing, clicking a mouse, tapping, speaking, or any other method of interacting with a user interface. The graphical user interface on the device may be a web-based user interface provided by a web browser (e.g. GOOGLE CHROME, Microsoft INTERNET EXPLORER, or Mozilla Firefox provided by Mozilla Foundation of Mountain View, Calif.), or may be an application installed on a user device capable of opening a network connection to simulated phishing campaign manager 250 or may be any other type of interface.

In an implementation, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 and/or server 106 may make choices concerning how a simulated phishing attack is to be carried out. For example, a graphical user interface run by the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may be displayed to the server 106. A user via the server 106 may input parameters for the attack that affect how it will be carried out. For example, via the server 106 a user may make choices as to which users to include as potential targets in the attack, the method of determining which users are to be selected as targets of the attack, the timing of various aspects of the attack, whether to use an attack template that includes values for one or a plurality of failure indicators, how responses from targeted users should be uniquely identified, and other choices. These choices may be made by selecting options displayed on a graphical user interface from dropdown menus, being presented with choices through a simulated attack wizard, or in any other appropriate manner.

In an implementation, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may allow the server 106, such as via application programming interfaces (APIs), to access and/or change settings of an account maintained with any party involved with the attack, such as, for example, a third party security service provider, or may allow the user group management function 212 to access and/or change settings of an account maintained with a third party security service provider, such as one that e.g. manages an exploit server, view bills and/or make payments to a third party security service provider, to perform these functions with other third parties involved in the attack, or provide any other functions that would be appropriate for facilitating communications between the server 106 and any other parties involved in the attack.

The system 200 includes also the client 102. A client may be a target of any simulated phishing attack. For example, the client may be an employee, member, or independent contractor working for an organization that is performing a security checkup or conducts ongoing simulated phishing attacks to maintain security. The client 102 may be any device used by the client. The client need not own the device for it to be considered a client device 102. The client 102 may be any computing device, such as a desktop computer, a laptop, a mobile device, or any other computing device. In some embodiments, the client 102 may be a server or set of servers accessed by the client. For example, the client may be the employee or a member of an organization. The client may access a server that is e.g. owned or managed or otherwise associated with the organization. Such a server may be a client 102.

In some embodiments, the client 102 may further include a user interface 266 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen, or any other appropriate user interface. This may be a user interface that is e.g. connected directly to a client 102, such as, for example, a keyboard connected to a mobile device, or may be connected indirectly to a client 102, such as, for example, a user interface of a client device used to access a server client 102. The client 102 may include a display 268, such as a screen, a monitor connected to the device in any manner, or any other appropriate display.

In an implementation, the client 102 may include a messaging application 270. The messaging application 270 may be any application capable of viewing, editing, and/or sending messages. For example, the messaging application 270 may be an instance of an application that allows viewing of a desired message type, such as any web browser, a Gmail™ application, Microsoft Outlook™, WhatsApp™, a text messaging application, or any other appropriate application. In some embodiments, the messaging application 270 can be configured to display simulated phishing attack emails. Furthermore, the messaging application 270 can be configured to allow the target to generate reply messages or forwarded messages in response to the messages displayed by the messaging application 270.

In some embodiments, the client 102 may include a communications module 264. This may be a library, application programming interface (API), set of scripts, or any other code that may facilitate communications between the client 102 and any of the server 106, a third-party server, or any other server. In some embodiments, the communications module 264 determines when to transmit information from the client 102 to external servers via a network 104. In some embodiments, the information transmitted by the communications module 264 may correspond to a message, such as an email, generated by the messaging application 270.

In some embodiments, the server 106 includes a simulated phishing campaign manager 250. This simulated phishing campaign manager 250 analyzes which phishing email templates are most effective in generating user failures when the template is used in a simulated phishing attack. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 additionally determines what the most common failure types are for a given template. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may perform additional analysis across many different templates used to determine which failure indicators lead to the highest rate of failures.

For example, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may include data collected from targets, records of failures such as a listing of which targets replied to a simulated phishing email, systemic or other security measures in place during the simulated phishing attacks, time or date logs, user identifiers, data detailing the results or analysis of attack results including data that indicates associations between attack results, and any other appropriate data. The server 106 may view, save, share, print, or perform any other appropriate action with the attack results. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may perform analysis on the attack results, possibly upon request of the server 106. For example, this analysis may include determining which users are a security risk based on having a number of failures above a predetermined threshold, whether certain security systems in place are effective by e.g. correlating the presence of such security systems with a lower than average incidence of failures. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may allow an attack manager to view, on a graphical user interface run by the attack management application 214, such as for example a timeline of overall failure rates, which may be useful in helping to determine whether a security policy that was instituted at a particular time was effective in improving security.

In some embodiments, reply emails sent from the client to the server 106 can be processed by the simulated phishing campaign manager 250. For example, simulated phishing campaign manager 250 can be configured to process reply emails received from one or more target clients 260 to determine the identities of the targets who sent the reply emails. In some embodiments, the identities of the targets may be determined based in part on the unique identifiers included within each reply email received by the server 106.

The system 200 may include a network 104. The network 104 may be any type and/or form of network. The geographical scope of the network 104 may vary widely and the network 104 can be a body area network (BAN), a personal area network (PAN), a local-area network (LAN), e.g. Intranet, a metropolitan area network (MAN), a wide area network (WAN), or the Internet. The topology of the network 104 may be of any form and may include, e.g., any of the following: point-to-point, bus, star, ring, mesh, or tree. The network 104 may be an overlay network which is virtual and sits on top of one or more layers of other networks 104′. The network 104 may be of any such network topology as known to those ordinarily skilled in the art capable of supporting the operations described herein. The network 104 may utilize different techniques and layers or stacks of protocols, including, e.g., the Ethernet protocol, the internet protocol suite (TCP/IP), the ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) technique, the SONET (Synchronous Optical Networking) protocol, or the SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) protocol. The TCP/IP internet protocol suite may include application layer, transport layer, internet layer (including, e.g., IPv6), or the link layer. The network 104 may be a type of a broadcast network, a telecommunications network, a data communication network, or a computer network. The network 104 connects the server 106 and a client 102. The client 102 comprises a communications module 264, a user interface 266, a display 268, a messaging application 270, and a memory such as any embodiments of memory 122 described herein or any type and form of storage, such as a database or file system) The client 102 receives the email sent by the server 106 based upon the campaign created and executed by the simulated phishing campaign manager 250. The client 102 is able to receive the simulated phishing email via the messaging application 270, display the received email for the user using the display 268, and is able to accept user interaction via the user interface 266 responsive to the displayed email. If the user interacts with the simulated phishing email, the client traverses to a landing page used by the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 in the phishing campaign.

Referring to FIG. 2B in a general overview, FIG. 2B depicts an architecture capable of implementing smart groups. In some embodiments, system 200 may include additional architectural elements to provide smart group functionality. In some examples, server 106 includes smart group criteria selector 274, smart group criteria tracker 276, smart group reporter 280, and smart group management application 271. System 200 may include additional storage for smart groups 272 and smart group criteria 273. System 200 may also include smart group management application 271.

Referring to FIG. 2B in more detail, system 200 may include smart group criteria selector 274 to enable a system or company administrator to select one or more criteria to be applied to, or associated with, a smart group. Smart group criteria tracker 276 monitors and updates all the possible criteria that can be applied to, or associated with, a smart group. Smart group reporter 280 is used to create reports pertaining to the members of a smart group. Smart group management application 271 is used to create the membership for the smart group at the time of an indication that the smart group is to be used for a function in the computer-based security awareness system. Smart groups storage 272 may be used to store the one or more criteria associated with a smart group. Smart groups criteria storage 273 may be used to store all the possible criteria that can be applied to, or associated with, a smart group. Membership list are only created when they are going to be used, and they are not stored as static group membership lists are. In some embodiments, historic smart group membership lists may be archived to enable an administrator to look at changes in the smart group population. If an administrator wishes to know the current membership of a smart group, the administrator can request a list of the membership of the smart group, which will trigger a query based on the smart group criteria to generate the list that is presented to the administrator. This makes sure that the membership list is always current and not stale. The use of smart groups is not limited to simulated phishing campaigns, training campaigns, and report generation—smart groups can be used for any purpose where a list of users with one or more common attributes is required.

Each of the server 106, user group management function 212, user group management application 214, phishing email user interaction counter 216, user remediation training completion counter 218, phishing email interaction tracker 235, remediation training tracker 236, simulated phishing campaign manager 250, user interface manager 252, simulated phishing email generator 254, smart group criteria selector 274, smart group criteria tracker 276, smart group reporter 280 and smart group management application 271 may comprise a program, service, task, script, library, application or any type and form of executable instructions or code executable on one or more processors. Any of the server 106, user group management function 212, user group management application 214, phishing email user interaction counter 216, user remediation training completion counter 218, phishing email interaction tracker 235, remediation training tracker 236, simulated phishing campaign manager 250, user interface manager 252, simulated phishing email generator 254, smart group criteria selector 274, smart group criteria tracker 276, smart group reporter 280 and smart group management application 271 may be combined into one or more modules, applications, programs, services, tasks, scripts, libraries, applications, or executable code.

In some embodiments, a system administrator or a company administrator may be able to utilize the smart group management application 271 to create one or more smart groups with unique identifiers, such as a name, a number, a handle, or other unique identifier as known in the art. The smart group management application 271 may be integrated with or coupled to the memory 122 so as to provide the simulated group management application 271 access to parameters associated with users, user groups, smart groups, smart group criteria, remediation training, and other parameters associated with computer-based security awareness training. In some embodiments, the server 106 and any of the modules or components of server 106 are integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, of server 106 or of another device, such as an external server, data source, software, system, etc., that may contain information about the plurality of users.

The administrator may wish to apply the smart group to the entire population of users, or may wish to apply to smart group to a subset of the population of users.

The administrator may also rename an existing smart group, or merge one or more existing smart groups using the smart group management application 271. In an implementation, smart group criteria selector 274 may manage the process by which a company administrator or a system administrator selects the criteria to use when identifying users that belong to the smart group. Smart group management application 271 and smart group criteria selector 274 may process input from the server 106 and/or may provide access as needed to various applications, modules, and other software components of the server 106 to other various applications, modules, and other software components of the server 106. The smart group criteria selector 274 may present a choice of criteria to an administrator using a user interface which may be provided by user interface manager 252 of simulated phishing campaign manager 250. For example, the criteria may be presented as a drop-down menu from which the administrator may be able to select one or more criteria for the smart group. The criteria that are selectable by the administrator are stored in the smart group criteria storage 273. These criteria may be updated from time to time. The smart group management application 271 may be an application, service, daemon, routine, or other executable logic for generating messages. The messages generated by the smart group management application may be of any appropriate format.

In some embodiments, smart group management application 271 provides an indicator noting which group is a smart group when shown in a list of all groups. For example, the smart groups can be listed prior to or after the “normal” console static groups with a heading for each type of group. The smart group management application 271 includes user interface that allows administrators to set up or configure the smart groups. This interface can be a fully graphical user interface that includes e.g., drop down boxes (i.e., operators) so you can select provided criteria (e.g., “all users that have been phished” or “all users who were not phished in the last 30 days”). In some examples, the administrator can enter or modify the date or time period for tracking criteria. In some embodiments, the administrator can press a plus (+) button and add criteria (e.g., add criteria, then add more criteria, etc.) in order to create the smart group.

Smart group criteria selector 274 enables a system or company administrator to select one or more criteria to be applied to, or associated with, a smart group. The smart group criteria selector 274 may be integrated with or coupled to the memory 122 so as to provide the simulated group management application 271 access to parameters associated with users, user groups, smart groups, smart group criteria, remediation training, and other parameters associated with computer-based security awareness training. In some embodiments, the server 106 and any of the modules or components of server 106 are integrated with or coupled to memory or a memory store or otherwise a storage, such as a database, of server 106 or of another device, such as an external server, data source, software, system, etc., that may contain information about the plurality of users.

An administrator (may be a system administrator or a company administrator) may wish to create a smart group at any time, for example before a simulated phishing campaign, before requesting a report, when the company active directory has been integrated, when a computer-based security awareness training program is established, etc. In some embodiments, when creating a smart group, the system 200 saves a name for the smart group and criteria selected for the smart group using the smart group criteria selector 274. The name of the smart group and the criteria for the smart group may be stored in smart groups storage 272. The criteria for the smart group does not change, but the users that meet the criteria of the smart group may change over time. The list of users for the smart group is therefore only generated when an indication is received that the smart group is to be used for some purpose.

The smart group criteria selector 274 can be used to change the criteria of a smart group by an administrator at any time after the smart group is created. Smart groups may be based on multiple criteria, for example, the system can combine one or more logical operators with multiple criteria together (e.g., “users who have not been trained” AND “users who have been phished in the past x months” criteria). In some embodiments, the system 200 may limit the number of criteria that may be combined to form a smart group.

In some embodiments, system 200 includes the ability to nest static groups within smart groups. For example, instead of just having criteria which determines which users are members of a group because of specific criteria or attributes, the smart group criteria selector 274 may also allow the administrator to select existing static groups and smart groups, such that the members of the static group or first smart group are also members of the second smart group. In some examples, the system 200 and the smart group criteria selector 274 are also able to select organizational or administrative groups, for example all users who are a member of the accounting group. In a nested group situation, the second and subsequent groups included within the nest may or may not be criteria-based.

In one embodiment, a smart group is created by an administrator before a campaign. The administrator names the smart group (Group A) and chooses criteria for the group, for example “all users that have never been trained”, or “users who haven't been phished in last 5 months”. Then, the administrator creates a training campaign and directs the system (via a user interface) to use the members of Group A for the training campaign. Before the training campaign starts, the system compiles a list of users that meet the Group A's criteria (e.g., “users who have never been trained”) at this specific moment in time and then adds these users to the training campaign. At this point in time, these added users are considered members of smart group “Group A”. In this specific example, the moment that the users have completed training, they would no longer be a member of the smart group since the smart group membership only includes “users who have never been trained”. Thus, the smart group's membership is dynamic, and the instantaneous membership changes as events take place.

Smart group criteria can consist of any attribute that could be applicable to a user. Smart group criteria tracker 276 monitors and updates all the possible criteria that can be applied to, or associated with, a smart group. Some examples of smart group criteria include:

-   -   phish prone percentage for user;     -   number of times the user has interacted with a phishing message;     -   number of times the user has interacted with a simulated         phishing message;     -   whether the user has been phished in the last X         days/weeks/months;     -   whether the user has been trained in the last X         days/weeks/months;     -   whether the user has been part of a simulated phishing campaign         in the last X days/weeks/months;     -   Different in user “clicks” tracked before and after training;     -   Number of user “clicks” tracked over a specific time period         (e.g., X days/weeks/months); and     -   Number of user “replies” tracked over a specific time period         (e.g., X days/weeks/months).

Data applied in determining if a user fits smart group criteria may be limited to a specific time period (e.g., XXX days/weeks/months). Examples of smart groups created based on above criteria list can include:

-   -   Users with a personal phish prone percentage greater than X         (e.g., “worst 5% clickers”, “worst 10% clickers”);     -   Users that have “clicked” more than X times in the past Y         months;     -   Users that have or have not been phished in X months;     -   Users that have or have not been trained in X months;     -   Users that have or have not “clicked” after finishing training;     -   Users that have “never clicked” or “non-clickers” group (e.g.,         users who have not clicked in X days or Y months or perhaps in         last Z campaigns);     -   Users that have failed via some mode (“click”, data entered,         reply, etc. . . . ) in the past X months; and     -   Users that have “clicked” before training but not after         training.

In some embodiments, smart group reporter 280 is used to create reports pertaining to the members of a smart group. There may be instances where reporting of smart groups provides no users depending on the smart group criteria. For example, assume Group B is a smart group created based on the following criterion: “users who haven't been phi shed in the last 5 months”. At the start of a security awareness program, everyone in the organization participates in an initial simulated phishing campaign. If the smart group reporter 280 is requested to provide a report of the members of Group B before this campaign, the report would include all the users in the organization. After Group B is used for a campaign, if the smart group reporter 280 is requested to provide a report of the members of Group B after this campaign, the report would include no users in the organization. Smart groups may be created that are only used for campaigns or that are only used for reporting. For example, reporting may be focused more on geographic locations and overall health for a specific organization, group or location and less concerned about groups being set up in the console. For reporting, companies may want to aggregate or group information by some other criteria that has nothing to do with why they were phished or trained (e.g., check to see if there are people that have slipped through the cracks, or people that are doing well, or people that are always failures).

Referring to FIG. 3A in a general overview, FIG. 3A depicts an implementation of a method 300 for adding users to user groups. In a brief overview, the method 300 can include receiving a selection of a first user group for which to communicate simulated phishing emails of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 310). The method 300 can include receiving a selection of a second user group for which to add those users that interact with a simulated phishing email of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 320). The method can include receiving a first indication that a user of the first user group interacted with a simulated phishing email (step 330). The method can include, responsive to the first indication, automatically adding the user, who is a member of the first user group, to the second user group (step 340). The method can include receiving a second indication that the user completed remediation training (step 350). The method can include, responsive to the second indication, adding the user, who is a member of the second user group, back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group (step 360).

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may receive the selection of the first user group at step 310 and the selection of the second user group at step 320 via any type of interface, for example a graphical user interface (GUI), and application program interface (API), or a command line interface (CLI). The interface may be menu driven, or form based, or may be based on natural language processing or may be gesture driven. The first user group may be an existing user group, or the system administrator may create a new user group from scratch. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 may receive one user group or may receive more than one user group to receive the simulated phishing emails of the simulated phishing campaign. In one embodiment, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 receives a user group by enabling the creation of a custom user group. For example, one user group can be designated as holding or otherwise storing users selected to receive a simulated phishing email. In another example, a user group can be designated as holding or otherwise storing users that interacted with a simulated phishing email (e.g., by clicking on a link in the email). In another example, a user group can be designated as holding or otherwise storing users that did not interact with a simulated phishing email (e.g., did not click on a link in email). Other examples of group designations may be appreciated by one of skill in the art.

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 receives a first indication that a user of the first user group interacted with a simulated phishing email at step 330 through the use of the phishing email interaction tracker 235 receiving indications from the phishing email user interaction counter 216.

In some embodiments, at step 340, responsive to receiving the first indication that a user of the first user group interacted with a simulated phishing email, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 automatically adds the user, who is a member of the first user group, to the second user group. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 automatically adds the user to user groups. In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 also automatically removes the user from user groups.

In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 receives a second indication that the user completed remediation training at step 350 through the use of the remediation training tracker 236 receiving indications from the user remediation training completion counter 218.

In some embodiments, at step 360, responsive to receiving the second indication that the user completed remediation training, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 automatically adds the user, who is a member of the second user group, back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) and to a third user group. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 automatically adds the user to user groups. In some embodiments, the simulated phishing campaign manager 250 also automatically removes the user from user groups.

FIG. 3B depicts one embodiment of an implementation of a method 300 for adding the user to user groups. In a brief overview, the method 300 can include receiving a selection of a first user group for which to communicate simulated phishing emails of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 310). The method 300 can include receiving a selection of a second user group for which to add those users that interact with a simulated phishing email of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 320). The method can include receiving a first indication that a user of the first user group interacted with a simulated phishing email (step 330). The method can include tracking the number of times the user has interacted with simulated phishing emails (step 332). The method can include, responsive to the number of times the user has interacted with simulated phishing emails reaching a predetermined threshold, automatically adding the user, who is a member of the first user group, to the second user group (step 342). The method can include receiving a second indication that the user completed remediation training (step 350). The method can include, responsive to the second indication, adding the user, who is a member of the second user group, back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group (step 360).

In some embodiments, at step 332, the system tracks the total number of times ever that a given user has interacted with a simulated phishing email. In some embodiments, the system tracks the number of times that a given user has interacted with a simulated phishing email since the start of a specific simulated phishing campaign. In one embodiment, the system resets the count when the user completes remediation training related to simulated phishing emails. In one embodiment, the system administrator may manually reset the count of the number of times that a given user has interacted with a simulated phishing email.

In some embodiments, at step 342, the predetermined threshold is specific to the first user group. In some embodiments, the predetermined threshold is specific to a given user. In some embodiments, the threshold is predetermined at the start of the simulated phishing campaign. In some embodiments, there is a unique threshold for different types of user interactions with the simulated phishing email. In one embodiment, there is a unique predetermined threshold for the number of times the user interacted with the simulated phishing email by clicking on a link in the email. In one embodiment, there is a unique and predetermined threshold for the number of times the user interacted with the simulated phishing email by replying to the simulated phishing email.

Referring to FIG. 3C in a general overview, FIG. 3C depicts an implementation of a method 300 for adding a user to user groups. In a brief overview, the method 300 can include receiving a selection of a first user group for which to communicate simulated phishing emails of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 310). The method 300 can include receiving a selection of a second user group for which to add those users that interact with a simulated phishing email of a simulated phishing email campaign (step 320). The method can include receiving a first indication that a user of the first user group interacted with a simulated phishing email (step 330). The method can include, responsive to the first indication, automatically adding the user, who is a member of the first user group, to the second user group (step 340). The method can include tracking the number of courses of electronically tracked remediation training the user has completed (step 344). The method can include receiving a second indication that the user completed remediation training (step 350). The method can include, responsive to the second indication, automatically adding the user, who is a member of the second user group, to a predetermined user group corresponding to one or more courses of the number of courses the user has completed (step 362).

In some embodiments, at step 344, tracking the number of courses of electronically tracked remediation training the user has completed through the use of the remediation training tracker 236 receiving indications from the user remediation training completion counter 218.

FIG. 3D illustrates an embodiment where added users may be removed from one user group but added users remain members of a different user group. For example, the method can include, responsive to the second indication, keeping the user in the second user group while adding the user to either the first user group (where the user was removed from the first user group) or a third user group (step 354). In some embodiments, at step 354, responsive to the second indication, the user remains a member of the second user group while the user is added back to the first user group (for embodiments where the user was removed from the first user group) or to a third user group through the use of the simulated phishing campaign manager 250. The simulated phishing campaign manager 250 adds users to user groups and for some embodiments, removes users from user groups.

Referring to FIG. 4 in a general overview, FIG. 4 depicts an implementation of a method 400 for creating and using smart groups. In a brief overview, the method 400 can include establishing criteria for identifying one or more users of a plurality of users (step 400). The method 400 can include receiving a selection of at least one criteria for which to create a group (step 405). The method can include establishing a group comprising the at least one criteria (step 410). The method can include, receiving an indication to use the group (step 415). The method may include performing a query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group (step 420). The method may also include, responsive to the indication, identifying as members of the group the one or more users identified as a result of the query (step 440).

Referring to FIG. 4 in a more detail, the method 400 can include establishing criteria for identifying one or more users of a plurality of users (step 400). In some embodiments, the security awareness system administrator establishes criteria that can be used as a basis for identifying users. In some examples, a company administrator may define criteria to be used as a basis for identifying users. The criteria created by a company administrator may be proprietary to that company, or may be able to be shared by other companies that use the security awareness system platform. In some examples, the criteria established by a security awareness system administrator is stored in a smart group criteria storage 273. Company specific criteria may be stored in smart group criteria storage 273, or may be stored in a different storage on the server 106, on the client 102, or in the cloud 108.

Method 400 may include receiving a selection of at least one criteria for which to create a group (step 405). In some embodiments, a company administrator may be prompted to set up one or more smart groups prior to creating a simulated phishing campaign, and the system 200 may receive the selection of at least one criteria for the smart group as a response to the prompt. In some examples, a security awareness program may be created for a company by the security awareness system, and the system 200 receives the one or more criteria to set up one or more smart groups from the security awareness platform in response to the creation of the company's security awareness program.

Method 400 may include establishing a group comprising at least one criteria (step 410). In some embodiments, the group is established using more than one criteria that are combined by one or more logical operators, such as AND, OR, NOT, etc. In some examples, when the group is established it will be clearly identified as a smart group. The group may be additionally classified as a smart group for use in campaigns, and/or a smart group for use in training, and/or smart group for use in reporting. In some embodiments, the system 200 establishes the group by running one or more query against a database containing a plurality of users and their associated attributes which correspond at least in part to the smart group criteria. In some examples, the system 200 queries devices, databases, or other memory storage that is outside of the server, for example a database hosted by a third party, or a database hosted by the company.

Method 400 may include receiving an indication to use the group (step 415). The indication to use the group may comprise any type of activation, trigger, enablement, execution or access of or to the group. The use, activation or execution of the group may be triggered by any type of event or interaction identifying, referencing. integrating or incorporating the group. For example, access to, identification and/or selection of the group via a user interface may activate or execute the group or be a use of the group. For example, access to, identification and/or selection of the group via an application programming interface (API) may activate or execute the group or be a use of the group. For example, referencing the group in a policy and upon triggering the policy activates or executes or uses the group. Any time the membership of the group may be resolved or determined, or be triggered to be resolved or determined, can be an indication to use the request,

In some embodiments, the indication is a request to begin a simulated phishing campaign including at least users of the smart group. In some examples, the indication is a request to begin a training campaign including at least the users of the smart group. In some examples, the indication may be a request from an administrator for a report including the smart group. The indication may be a request from an administrator to compare the current membership of a smart group with a historical membership of the same smart group. The indication may be a request from an administrator to compare the current membership of a smart group with the current membership of another group, which may be a smart group or may be a static group. The indication may be a request for a membership list of the smart group. The indication may be the creation of a report referencing the smart group.

Method 400 may include performing a query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group (step 420). In some embodiments, the server may receive more than one indication to use the smart group, and upon receiving each indication, the system will run the query based on the criteria of the smart group at the time of receiving the indication. In some examples, method 400 may include adding the one or more users of the group identified as a result of the query to an instance of execution of a simulated phishing campaign or to a report being created. In some embodiments, the system may perform a query against a database of the server 106 or a second device, database or server, on the cloud or in a company's server, where the database contains attributes and information about the plurality of users. In some examples, the query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group is done at the time of use. For example, if the group is going to be used for a simulated phishing campaign, the query is run at the time when the system needs to perform and action on the users, such as send the users a simulated phishing message. In some examples, the query is run at a predetermined time based on the indication, for example the query may be run at a fixed point in time relative to the start of the campaign, even if the list is used at a later time during the campaign. In some examples, the query may be run periodically, such that a recent membership list is always ready to be used in a moment without latency, when an indication is made. Responsive to the query, the system identifies as members of the group the one or more users identified as a result of the query (step 440). In some embodiment, the system associates these users with the smart group until such time as the query is run again. In some embodiments, the system associates these users with the smart group until the group is used for the function which triggered the indication to run the query. For example, if the query was triggered due to a request to run a simulated phishing campaign, the users that are identified as a result of the query are associated as members of the smart group until after the simulated phishing campaign has been completed. In some embodiments, the system associates the users with the smart group for a fixed period of time. In some embodiments, the system associates the users with the smart group until any other query is run by the system.

It should be understood that the systems described above may provide multiple ones of any or each of those components and these components may be provided on either a standalone machine or, in some embodiments, on multiple machines in a distributed system. The systems and methods described above may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof. In addition, the systems and methods described above may be provided as one or more computer-readable programs embodied on or in one or more articles of manufacture. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass code or logic accessible from and embedded in one or more computer-readable devices, firmware, programmable logic, memory devices (e.g., EEPROMs, ROMs, PROMs, RAMs, SRAMs, etc.), hardware (e.g., integrated circuit chip, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), etc.), electronic devices, a computer readable non-volatile storage unit (e.g., CD-ROM, floppy disk, hard disk drive, etc.). The article of manufacture may be accessible from a file server providing access to the computer-readable programs via a network transmission line, wireless transmission media, signals propagating through space, radio waves, infrared signals, etc. The article of manufacture may be a flash memory card or a magnetic tape. The article of manufacture includes hardware logic as well as software or programmable code embedded in a computer readable medium that is executed by a processor. In general, the computer-readable programs may be implemented in any programming language, such as LISP, PERL, C, C++, C#, PROLOG, or in any byte code language such as JAVA. The software programs may be stored on or in one or more articles of manufacture as object code.

While various embodiments of the methods and systems have been described, these embodiments are exemplary and in no way limit the scope of the described methods or systems. Those having skill in the relevant art can effect changes to form and details of the described methods and systems without departing from the broadest scope of the described methods and systems. Thus, the scope of the methods and systems described herein should not be limited by any of the exemplary embodiments and should be defined in accordance with the accompanying claims and their equivalents. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for dynamically identifying members of a group at a time of use of the group, the method comprising (a) establishing, by a server, a group comprising criteria for identifying one or more users from a plurality of users, the group configured to resolve members of the group based on the one or more users matching the criteria at time of execution of the group; (b) receiving, by the server, an indication to use the group for a simulated phishing campaign, the group being executed responsive to the indication; (c) performing, by the server responsive to execution of the group a query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group; and (d) identifying, by the server responsive to the indication, as members of the group for the simulated phishing campaign the one or more users identified as a result of the query.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein (a) further comprises establishing criteria for identifying one or more users of the plurality of users.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein (a) further comprises receiving a selection of at least one criteria for which to create the group.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein (a) further comprises establishing the group to comprise a plurality of criteria combined by one or more logical operators.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the indication comprises one of execution of a simulated phishing campaign using the group or creation of a report identifying the group.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the indication comprises a request for membership of the group.
 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising adding the one or more users of the group identified as the result of the query to an instance of execution of the simulated phishing campaign or the creation of the report.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein (c) further comprises performing the query against a database of one of the server or a second device, the database comprising information about the plurality of users.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein (c) further comprises performing the query on the plurality of users established by one of the server or a second device.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein (d) further comprising compiling a list of the one or more users as members of the group and providing responsive to the indication the list as members of the group.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprises receiving, by the server, a second indication to use the group, performing, by the server, a second query and identifying a different one or more users from the plurality of users as members of the group.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the indication to use the group is based on one of the following events: an administrator requesting membership of the group via a user interface, an initiation of execution of a simulated phishing campaign using the group and a creation of a report referencing the group.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group is performed at the time of use of the group.
 14. A system dynamically identifying members of a group at a time of use of the group, the system comprising: a server comprising one or more processors, coupled to memory and configured to: establish a group comprising criteria for identifying one or more users from a plurality of users, the group configured to resolve members of the group based on the one or more users matching the criteria at time of execution of the group; receive an indication to use the group for a simulated phishing campaign, the group being executed responsive to the indication; wherein the server is configured to: responsive to execution of the group, perform a query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users of the plurality of users match the criteria of the group; and identify, responsive to the indication, as members of the group for the simulated phishing campaign the one or more users identified as a result of the query.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the server is further configured to establish criteria for identifying one or more users of a plurality of users.
 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the server is further configured to receive a selection of at least one criteria for which to create the group.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the indication comprises one of execution of a simulated phishing campaign using the group or creation of a report identifying the group.
 18. The system of claim 14, wherein the server is further configured to compile a list of the one or more users as members of the group and providing responsive to the indication the list as members of the group.
 19. The system of claim 14, wherein the indication to use the group is based on one of the following events: an administrator requesting membership of the group via a user interface, an initiation of execution of a simulated phishing campaign using the group and a creation of a report referencing the group.
 20. The system of claim 14, wherein the query of the plurality of users to determine which one or more users or the plurality of users match the criteria of the group is performed at the time of use of the group. 